
WHEN IS IT CONTEMPT OF COURT THAT IS PUNISHABLE WITH JAIL FOR FAILURE TO PAY SUPPORT
The father contends that Family Court’s finding that he willfully violated the support order lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record, particularly in light of what he characterizes as his cogent, reasonable explanation for his inability to make good on child support arrears, well-supported by documentary evidence and his reasonable (even extreme) efforts
Read More
COURT DENIES A PARENT FROM MOVING AWAY WITH CHILD
The mother argues that Family Court should have granted her permission to move to Florida with the child. An initial custody determination is controlled by the best interests of the child, taking into consideration, among other things, the parents’ past performance and relative fitness, their willingness to foster a positive relationship between the child and
Read More
YOU MUST BE KIDDING – I CAN’T MOVE WITH MY CHILDREN A MERE 12.5 MILES ?
A parent seeking leave to relocate with a child bears the burden of establishing by a preponderance of the evidence that the proposed move would be in the child’s best interests. In determining whether a proposed move is in a child’s best interests, the Court of Appeals held in Matter of Tropea v. Tropea
Read More
CHILD SUPPORT IS NOT ALWAYS SET ON THE INCOME…
CHILD SUPPORT IS NOT ALWAYS SET ON THE INCOME… THAT A PARENT REPORTS ON THEIR TAXES The level of child support is determined by the parents’ ability to provide for their children rather than their current economic situation. A court need not rely upon a party’s own account of his or her finances but may
Read More
Compassion for the Client, Aggression for the Adversary
Gildin and Chapman is a boutique style law firm emphasizing all aspects of Family Law, Criminal Defense and Appeals. Both Steven Gildin and Brent Chapman have nearly three decades of legal experience successfully handling literally many thousands of cases from the very first call, throughout all litigation and trial and beyond. With this broad knowledge,
Read More
NO VISITS IF PARENT IS NOT VACCINATED
The Court restricted the non-vaccinated parent’s access to the child until they were vaccinated or underwent regular testing. New York is transitioning towards a “new normal” where citizens are taking precautions to balance staying safe from COVID-19 and its variants alongside the desire to return to some semblance of regular life. The widespread availability of
Read More
A JUDGE HAS NO POWER TO DIRECT ADMINISTRATION OF CHILDREN’S SERVICES TO FILE A NEGLECT CASE
To the extent that [prior precedent] decisions implicitly hold that Family Court may order a child protective agency to commence a proceeding under Family Ct Act article 10, they should no longer be followed for such proposition. Accordingly, in the absence of any express grant of authority by statute, Family Court erred in sua sponte
Read More
JOINT LEGAL CUSTODY ORDERED BY THE COURT
An award of joint legal custody is an aspirational goal in every custody matter and is particularly warranted where the parties are generally able to communicate with one another in a cooperative fashion. Although the parties have had disagreements about certain aspects of parenting, the record demonstrates that there is a modicum of communication and
Read More
GIRLFRIEND WHO HAD CONFLICTS WITH MOTHER NOT RESTRICTED FROM FATHER’S VISITS ; AN ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR A CHILD THAT IS TOO YOUNG TO COMMUNICATE
Family Court has the power to impose restrictions on a child’s interactions with third parties during visitation if it is in the child’s best interests to do so. Here, the record establishes that there were verbal and physical altercations between the mother and the girlfriend during the exchanges of the child. However, there is no
Read More
WHAT HAPPENS TO EXISTING CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT OBLIGATION IF ONE OF THE CHILDREN TURNS 21
The parties, who have three children together, were divorced by a judgment of divorce dated June 20, 2017. The judgment incorporated, but did not merge, a so-ordered stipulation of custody and access dated December 8, 2016, and a stipulation between the parties resolving issues of, inter alia, maintenance and child support that was placed on
Read More